European Commission launches infringement proceedings against the UK following its failure to name a candidate for EU Commissioner

European Commission launches infringement proceedings against the UK following its failure to name a candidate for EU Commissioner

Press release

Pubblicato in EULaw | Lascia un commento

The International Master in Security, Intelligence and Strategic Studies (IMSISS)

http://securityintelligence-erasmusmundus.eu

The International Master in Security, Intelligence and Strategic Studies (IMSISS) is a 24 month Erasmus Mundus Joint Master Degree (EMJMD) awarded by a consortium of European universities – University of Glasgow (UK); Dublin City University (Ireland); Charles University in Prague (Czech Republic) and from 2020, the University of Trento (Italy).

Pubblicato in natsec | Lascia un commento

Trump expected to delay European auto tariff decision: EU officials

https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trade-autos-eu/trump-expected-to-delay-european-auto-tariff-decision-eu-officials-idUSKBN1XL2KE

See https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/adjusting-imports-automobiles-automobile-parts-united-states/

Pubblicato in natsec, trade, trade wars | Lascia un commento

ICJ: Ukraine – Russia – The Court finds that it has jurisdiction to entertain the claims made by Ukraine and that the Application in relation to those claims is admissible

APPLICATION OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION FOR THE SUPPRESSION OF THE FINANCING OF TERRORISM AND OF THE INTERNATIONAL CONVENTION ON THE ELIMINATION OF ALL FORMS OF RACIAL DISCRIMINATION (UKRAINE v. RUSSIAN FEDERATION)

166-20191108-

Pubblicato in Russia, Terrorismo, Ukraine | Lascia un commento

Polish rules relating to the retirement age of judges and public prosecutors, adopted in July 2017, are contrary to EU law – Le norme polacche relative all’età per il pensionamento dei giudici e dei pubblici ministeri, adottate nel luglio 2017, sono contrarie al diritto dell’Unione

5 November 2019
Judgment in case C-192/18 Commission v Poland

cp190134en

In today’s judgment the Court, upholds the action for failure to fulfil obligations brought by the Commission against the Republic of Poland and held that that Member State had failed to fulfil its obligations under EU law, first, by establishing a different retirement age for men and women who were judges or public prosecutors in Poland and, second, by lowering the retirement age of judges of the ordinary courts while conferring on the Minister for Justice the power to extend the period of active service of those judges.

5 novembre 2019
Sentenza C-192/18 Commissione/Polonia

La Corte di giustizia ha accolto il ricorso per inadempimento proposto dalla Commissione contro la Polonia e ha dichiarato che tale Stato membro, introducendo, da un lato, un’età per il pensionamento differente per le donne e per gli uomini appartenenti alla magistratura polacca, e abbassando, dall’altro, l’età per il pensionamento dei giudici dei tribunali ordinari, conferendo al contempo al Ministro della Giustizia il potere di prorogarne il periodo di servizio, è venuto meno agli obblighi ad esso incombenti ai sensi del diritto dell’Unione.

CP190134IT

Pubblicato in human rights | Lascia un commento

Advocate General Sharpston: the Court should rule that, by refusing to comply with the provisional and time-limited mechanism for the mandatory relocation of applicants for international protection, Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic have failed to fulfil their obligations under EU law

Advocate General’s Opinion in Cases C-715/17 Commission v Poland, C-718/17 Commission v Hungary and C-719/17 Commission v Czech Republic 31 october 2019

Advocate General Sharpston: the Court should rule that, by refusing to comply with the provisional and time-limited mechanism for the mandatory relocation of applicants for international protection, Poland, Hungary and the Czech Republic have failed to fulfil their obligations under EU law

These Member States cannot invoke their responsibilities with regard to the maintenance of law and order and the safeguarding of internal security in order to disapply a valid EU measure with which they disagree

cp190133en

Pubblicato in asylum, natsec | Lascia un commento

Intervento di Mario Draghi, Presidente della BCE, in occasione della cerimonia di commiato in suo onore

https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/key/date/2019/html/ecb.sp191028~7e8b444d6f.it.html

Pubblicato in EULaw | Lascia un commento

The European Council, in agreement with the UK, extended the period under art. 50(3) TEU. Il Consiglio europeo d’intesa con il Regno Unito proroga il termine previsto dall’articolo 50, paragrafo 3, TUE

The European Council adopted a decision to extend the period under Article 50(3) in the context of the UK’s intention to withdraw from the EU. The extension is until 31 January 2020 to allow more time for the withdrawal agreement to be ratified.

The UK can leave earlier, on 1 December 2019 or 1 January 2020, if the deal is ratified by both parties.

The decision was taken unanimously by the European Council by written procedure, with the agreement of the UK.

Il Consiglio europeo ha adottato una decisione che proroga il termine previsto dall’articolo 50, paragrafo 3, (del trattato sull’Unione europea), a seguito della notifica, da parte del Regno Unito, della sua intenzione di recedere dall’Unione europea.

La proroga durerà fino al 31 gennaio 2020 per dare più tempo alla ratifica dell’accordo di recesso. Il recesso può avere luogo anteriormente, il 1° dicembre 2019 o il 1° gennaio 2020, se l’accordo di recesso è ratificato da entrambe le parti.

Per la durata della proroga il Regno Unito rimane uno Stato membro soggetto a tutti i diritti e gli obblighi sanciti dai trattati e dal diritto dell’UE.

La decisione è stata presa all’unanimità dal Consiglio europeo mediante procedura scritta, d’intesa con il Regno Unito, come illustrato nella lettera del primo ministro del Regno Unito Boris Johnson al presidente del Consiglio europeo Donald Tusk. Il Consiglio europeo ha inoltre approvato una dichiarazione che accompagna la decisione.

xt20025-re01-en19

XT_20024_2019_REV_2_IT

XT_20024_2019_REV_2_EN

Pubblicato in Brexit | Lascia un commento

Brexit ‘no-deal’ preparedness

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/no-deal-readiness-report

No_deal_readiness_paper

https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/IP_19_5509

Brexit_Timeline.pdf

Brexit__no-deal__preparedness__Final_Commission

Pubblicato in Brexit | Lascia un commento

Brexit – UK PM: I don’t want an extension (signed) – I want an extension (un-signed)

PM_to_Donald_Tusk_19_October_2019

Letter_from_UK_to_EU_Council

Pubblicato in Brexit | Lascia un commento

Brexit: the European Commission has today reached an agreement at negotiator level with the UK on a revised Protocol on Ireland / Northern Ireland and a revised Political Declaration on the framework of the future EU-UK relationship

Brexit: What did you agree with the UK today?

In light of the United Kingdom’s decision to withdraw from the European Union, the European Commission has today reached an agreement at negotiator level with the UK on a revised Protocol on Ireland / Northern Ireland and a revised Political Declaration on the framework of the future EU-UK relationship.

The revised Protocol provides a legally operative solution that avoids a hard border on the island of Ireland, protects the all-island economy and the Good Friday (Belfast) Agreement in all its dimensions, and safeguards the integrity of the EU Single Market.

Northern Ireland will remain aligned to a limited set of Single Market rules to avoid a hard border on the island of Ireland. Today’s Protocol will also avoid any customs border on the island of Ireland, while ensuring that Northern Ireland remains part of the UK’s customs territory. The Northern Ireland Assembly will have a decisive voice on the long-term application of relevant EU law in Northern Ireland.

The main change in the Political Declaration relates to the future EU-UK economic relationship where the current UK government has opted for a model based on a Free Trade Agreement (FTA). The Political Declaration confirms the ambition to conclude an FTA with zero tariffs and quotas between the EU and the UK, and states that robust commitments on a level playing field should ensure open and fair competition.

Pubblicato in Brexit | Lascia un commento

Protetto: Brexit

Il contenuto è protetto da password. Per visualizzarlo inserisci di seguito la password:

Pubblicato in Brexit | Inserisci la tua password per visualizzare i commenti.

Arbitrator issues decision in Airbus subsidy dispute

https://www.wto.org/english/news_e/news19_e/316arb_e.htm

On 2 October, a WTO arbitrator issued its decision on the level of countermeasures the United States may request with respect to the European Union and certain EU member states in “European Communities and Certain member States — Measures Affecting Trade in Large Civil Aircraft” (DS316).

“9.2. The United States may therefore request authorization from the DSB to take countermeasures with respect to the European Union and certain member States, as indicated in document WT/DS316/18, at a level not exceeding, in total, USD 7,496.623 million annually. These countermeasures may take the form of (a) suspension of tariff concessions and related obligations under the GATT 1994, and/or (b) suspension of horizontal or sectoral commitments and obligations contained in the United States’ services schedule with regard to all services defined in the Services Sectoral Classification List, except for financial services.

316arb_conc_e

Pubblicato in lawfare, trade, trade wars, WTO | Lascia un commento

Conference: EU Sanctions against the Russian Federation and the Islamic Republic of Iran in a comparative perspective

LOCANDINA A3

Pubblicato in EULaw | Lascia un commento

Call for Papers Research Forum CfP “Solidarity. The Quest for Founding Utopias of International Law” 23-24 April 2020, Catania. Deadline: 30 September 2019 –

Call for Papers Research Forum CfP “Solidarity. The Quest for Founding Utopias of International Law” 23-24 April 2020, Catania. Deadline: 30 September 2019

CATANIA_2020-ESIL-Research-Forum-Call-for-Papers

Pubblicato in Conferences and Workshops | Lascia un commento

Russia and Ukraine Swap Dozens of Prisoners

Pubblicato in Russia, sanctions, Ukraine | Lascia un commento

Launch of Judicial Counter-Terrorism Register at Eurojust

A Counter-Terrorism Register (CTR) has been launched at Eurojust to reinforce the judicial response in Member States to terrorist threats and to improve security for citizens. The CTR, which entered into force on 1 September, centralises key judicial information to establish links in proceedings against suspects of terrorist offences. The CTR is managed by Eurojust in The Hague on a 24-hour basis and provides proactive support to national judicial authorities. This centralised information will help prosecutors to coordinate more actively and to identify the suspects or networks that are being investigated in specific cases with potential cross-border implications.

http://www.eurojust.europa.eu/press/PressReleases/Pages/2019/2019-09-05.aspx

Pubblicato in natsec, Terrorismo | Lascia un commento

GOLDEN POWER: 5G

Il Consiglio dei Ministri, su proposta del Ministro dello sviluppo economico Stefano Patuanelli, a norma dell’articolo 1-bis del decreto-legge 15 marzo 2012, n. 21, ha deliberato:

l’esercizio dei poteri speciali in relazione alla informativa notificata dalla società LINKEM S.p.a. relativa a contratti o accordi aventi ad oggetto l’acquisto di beni e servizi relativi alla progettazione, alla realizzazione, alla manutenzione e alla gestione delle reti inerenti i servizi di comunicazione elettronica a banda larga su tecnologia 5G e acquisizione di componenti ad alta intensità tecnologica funzionali alla predetta realizzazione o gestione;
l’esercizio di poteri speciali, con condizioni e prescrizioni, in relazione all’operazione notificata dalla società Vodafone S.p.a. consistente in accordi aventi ad oggetto l’acquisto di beni e servizi per la realizzazione e la gestione di reti di comunicazione elettronica basate sulla tecnologia 5G;
l’esercizio dei poteri speciali in relazione all’informativa notificata dalla società TIM S.p.a. relativa agli accordi conclusi prima del 26 marzo relativi ad apparati e sistemi di comunicazione rispetto ai quali la tecnologia 5G può essere considerata una naturale evoluzione;
l’esercizio dei poteri speciali, con prescrizioni, in relazione all’informativa notificata dalla società Wind Tre S.p.a. circa gli accordi stipulati con la società Huawei, aventi ad oggetto l’acquisto di beni e servizi per la realizzazione e la gestione di reti di comunicazione elettronica basate sulla tecnologia 5G;
l’esercizio dei poteri speciali in relazione all’informativa notificata dalla società FASTWEB S.p.a. relativa all’acquisto dalla società ZTE Corporation degli apparati relativi alle componenti radio per la realizzazione dell’ultima tratta della rete 5G FWA.

Pubblicato in Golden Power, natsec | Lascia un commento

United States – INTERNATIONAL EMERGENCY ECONOMIC POWERS

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/50/chapter-35

The International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA) is a United States federal law authorizing the president to regulate international commerce after declaring a national emergency in response to any unusual and extraordinary threat to the United States which has its source in whole or substantial part outside the United States.

As part of an ongoing trade war with China, on August 24, 2019, Trump tweeted that he “hereby ordered” US companies to start looking at alternatives to China on the basis of claimed powers under IEEPA.

Trump, however, did not formally declare an emergency as required by IEEPA.

(On May 30, 2019, the White House announced that President Donald Trump would use IEEPA powers to introduce tariffs on Mexican exports in response to the national security threat of illegal immigration from Mexico into the United States.)

Pubblicato in lawfare, natsec, trade wars | Lascia un commento

Call for Proposals: International Economic Law And Security Interests Conference

The Amsterdam Center for International Law in collaboration with ESIL’s International Economic Law Interest Group invites scholars to submit proposals for the ‘International Economic Law And Security Interests Conference’ which will take place on 14 and 15 November 2019.

https://acil.uva.nl/content/events/conferences/2019/11/international-economic-law-and-security-interests-conference.html?1563816001462&1564526139614

Pubblicato in natsec | Lascia un commento

Adjusting Imports of Automobiles and Automobile Parts Into the United States

Now, Therefore, I, Donald J. Trump, President of the United States of America, by the authority vested in me by the Constitution and the laws of the United States of America, including section 301 of title 3, United States Code, and section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended, do hereby proclaim as follows:

(1) The Trade Representative, in consultation with the Secretary, the Secretary of the Treasury, and any other senior executive branch officials the Trade Representative deems appropriate, shall pursue negotiation of agreements contemplated in 19 U.S.C. 1862(c)(3)(A)(i) to address the threatened impairment of the national security with respect to imported automobiles and certain automobile parts from the European Union, Japan, and any other country the Trade Representative deems appropriate.

(2) Within 180 days of the date of this proclamation, the Trade Representative shall update me on the outcome of the negotiations directed under clause (1) of this proclamation.

(3) The Secretary shall continue to monitor imports of automobiles and certain automobile parts and shall, from time to time, in consultation with any senior executive branch officials the Secretary deems appropriate, review the status of such imports with respect to the national security. The Secretary shall inform the President of any circumstances that in the Secretary’s opinion might indicate the need for further action by the President under section 232 of the Trade Expansion Act of 1962, as amended.

(4) Any provision of previous proclamations and Executive Orders that is inconsistent with the actions taken in this proclamation is superseded to the extent of such inconsistency.

Pubblicato in natsec, trade, trade wars | Lascia un commento

New sanctions regime in the field of cybersecurity

Council Regulation (EU) 2019/796 of 17 May 2019 concerning restrictive measures against cyber-attacks threatening the Union or its Member States

Council Decision (CFSP) 2019/797 of 17 May 2019 concerning restrictive measures against cyber-attacks threatening the Union or its Member States

CELEX32019D0797ENTXT

CELEX32019D0797ITTXT

CELEX32019R0796ITTXT

CELEX32019R0796ENTXT

Pubblicato in cyber, sanctions | Lascia un commento

Executive Order on Securing the Information and Communications Technology and Services Supply Chain

https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential-actions/executive-order-securing-information-communications-technology-services-supply-chain/

https://www.whitehouse.gov/briefings-statements/message-congress-securing-information-communications-technology-services-supply-chain/

See also OFAC Sanctions Related to Significant Malicious Cyber-Enabled Activities

Pubblicato in natsec, sanctions, trade wars | Contrassegnato , | Lascia un commento

The period provided for in Article 50(3) TEU, as extended by the European Council Decision (EU) 2019/476, is hereby further extended until 31 October 2019. – Il termine previsto dall’articolo 50, paragrafo 3, TUE è ulteriormente prorogato fino al 31 ottobre 2019.

CELEX32019D0584ENTXT

CELEX32019D0584ITTXT

The period provided for in Article 50(3) TEU, as extended by the European Council Decision (EU) 2019/476, is hereby further extended until 31 October 2019.

This decision shall cease to apply on 31 May 2019 in the event that the United Kingdom has not held elections to the European Parliament in accordance with applicable Union law and has not ratified the Withdrawal Agreement by 22 May 2019.

Il termine previsto dall’articolo 50, paragrafo 3, TUE, quale prorogato dalla decisione (UE) 2019/476 del Consiglio europeo, è ulteriormente prorogato fino al 31 ottobre 2019.

La presente decisione cessa di applicarsi il 31 maggio 2019 nel caso in cui il Regno Unito non abbia tenuto le elezioni del Parlamento europeo conformemente al diritto dell’Unione e non abbia ratificato l’accordo di recesso entro il 22 maggio 2019.

Pubblicato in Brexit | Lascia un commento

Joint Statement UE – China Dichiarazione congiunta UE – Cina

euchina-joint-statement-9april2019

Pubblicato in EULaw | Contrassegnato , | Lascia un commento

ART. XXI GATT – SECURITY EXCEPTION: DS512: Russia — Measures Concerning Traffic in Transit

https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/dispu_e/cases_e/ds512_e.htm

7.126. The Panel finds as follows:
a. As of 2014, there has existed a situation in Russia’s relations with Ukraine that constitutes an emergency in international relations within the meaning of subparagraph (iii) of Article XXI(b) of the GATT 1994; and
b. each of the measures at issue was taken in time of this emergency in international relations within the meaning of subparagraph (iii) of Article XXI(b) of the GATT 1994.

512R

Pubblicato in natsec, Russia, Ukraine, WTO | Lascia un commento

CCDCOE: Huawei, 5G and China as a Security Threat

Huawei, 5G and China as a Security Threat

CCDCOE NATO COOPERATIVE CYBER DEFENCE CENTRE OF EXCELLENCE

CCDCOE-Huawei-2019-03-28-FINAL

Pubblicato in 5G, China, cyber, natsec | Lascia un commento

Cybersecurity of 5G networks – EU COMMISSION RECOMMENDATION

20190329 CommissionRecommendation-Cybersecurityof5Gnetworkspdf

Pubblicato in 5G, China, cyber, natsec | Lascia un commento

European Council Decision (EU) 2019/476 taken in agreement with the United Kingdom of 22 March 2019 extending the period under Article 50(3)TEU – Decisione (UE) 2019/476 del Consiglio europeo adottata d’intesa con il Regno Unito, del 22 marzo 2019, che proroga il termine previsto dall’articolo 50, paragrafo 3, TUE

CELEX32019D0476ENTXT

CELEX32019D0476ITTXT

In the event that the Withdrawal Agreement is approved by the House of Commons by 29 March 2019 at the latest, the period provided for in Article 50(3) TEU is extended until 22 May 2019.
In the event that the Withdrawal Agreement is not approved by the House of Commons by 29 March 2019 at the latest, the period provided for in Article 50(3) TEU is extended until 12 April 2019. In that event, the United Kingdom will indicate a way forward before 12 April 2019, for consideration by the European Council.

Qualora l’accordo di recesso sia approvato dalla Camera dei Comuni entro il 29 marzo 2019, il termine previsto dall’articolo 50, paragrafo 3, TUE è prorogato fino al 22 maggio 2019.
Qualora l’accordo di recesso non sia approvato dalla Camera dei Comuni entro il 29 marzo 2019, il termine previsto dall’articolo 50, paragrafo 3, TUE è prorogato fino al 12 aprile 2019. In tal caso il Regno Unito indicherà prima del 12 aprile 2019 il percorso da seguire, in vista del suo esame.

Pubblicato in EULaw | Contrassegnato | Lascia un commento

Regulation (EU) 2019/452 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 March 2019 establishing a framework for the screening of foreign direct investments into the Union – Regolamento (UE) 2019/452 del Parlamento europeo e del Consiglio, del 19 marzo 2019, che istituisce un quadro per il controllo degli investimenti esteri diretti nell’Unione

CELEX32019R0452ENTXT

CELEX32019R0452ITTXT

Pubblicato in EULaw | Contrassegnato , | Lascia un commento

Security threats connected with the rising Chinese technological presence in the EU and possible action on the EU level to reduce them

The European Parliament calls for a common approach to cybersecurity

TA-8-2019-0156_EN

Believes that the Union must take the lead on cybersecurity, by means of a common approach based on the effective and efficient use of EU, Member State and industry expertise, since a patchwork of divergent national decisions would be detrimental to the digital single market;
2. Expresses deep concern about the recent allegations that 5G equipment developed by Chinese companies may have embedded backdoors that would allow manufacturers and authorities to have unauthorised access to private and personal data and
telecommunications from the EU;
3. Is equally concerned about the potential presence of major vulnerabilities in the 5G equipment developed by these manufacturers if they were to be installed when rolling out 5G networks in the coming years;
4. Underlines that the implications for the security of networks and equipment are similar around the world and calls for the EU to draw lessons from the experience available, in order to be able to ensure the highest standards of cybersecurity; calls on the Commission to develop a strategy that puts Europe in a leading position in cybersecurity technology and is aimed at reducing Europe’s dependency on foreign technology in the field of cybersecurity; is of the view that whenever compliance with security requirements cannot be guaranteed adequate measures must be applied;
5. Calls on the Member States to inform the Commission of any national measure they intend to adopt in order to coordinate the Union’s response so as to ensure the highest standards of cybersecurity throughout the Union, and reiterates the importance of refraining from introducing disproportionate unilateral measures that would fragment the single market;
6. Reiterates that any entities providing equipment or services in the EU, irrespective of their country of origin, must comply with fundamental rights obligations and with EU and Member State law, including the legal framework as regards privacy, data protection and cybersecurity;
7. Calls on the Commission to assess the robustness of the Union’s legal framework in order to address concerns about the presence of vulnerable equipment in strategic sectors and backbone infrastructure; urges the Commission to present initiatives, including legislative proposals where appropriate, to address in due time any shortfalls detected, since the Union is in a constant process of identifying and addressing cybersecurity challenges and enhancing cybersecurity resilience in the EU;
8. Urges those Member States that have not yet fully transposed the NIS Directive to do so without delay, and calls on the Commission to monitor this transposition closely so as to ensure that its provisions are properly applied and enforced and that European citizens are better protected from external and internal security threats;
9. Urges the Commission and Member States to make sure that the reporting mechanisms introduced by the NIS Directive are properly applied; notes that the Commission and the Member States should follow up thoroughly on any security incidents or inappropriate reactions of suppliers, so as to address detected gaps;
10. Calls on the Commission to assess the need to further enlarge the scope of the NIS Directive to other critical sectors and services that are not covered by sector-specific legislation;
11. Welcomes and supports the agreement reached on the Cybersecurity Act and the reinforcement of the mandate of the EU Agency for Network and Information Security (ENISA), in order to better support Member States in tackling cybersecurity threats and attacks;
12. Urges the Commission to mandate ENISA to make it a priority to work on a

certification scheme for 5G equipment in order to ensure that the rollout of 5G in the Union meets the highest security standards and is resilient to backdoors or major vulnerabilities that would endanger the security of the Union’s telecommunication networks and dependent services; recommends that special attention be given to commonly used processes, products and software that by their sheer scale have a significant impact on the day-to-day life of citizens and the economy;
13. Warmly welcomes the proposals on cybersecurity competence centres and a network of national coordination centres, which are designed to help the EU retain and develop the technological and industrial capacities in cybersecurity that are needed to secure its digital single market; recalls, however, that certification should not exclude competent authorities and operators from scrutinising the supply chain in order to ensure the integrity and security of their equipment that operates in critical environments and telecom networks;
14. Recalls that cybersecurity demands high security standards; calls for a network that is secure by default and by design; urges the Member States, together with the Commission, to explore all available means to ensure a high level of security;
15. Calls on the Commission and the Member States, in cooperation with ENISA, to provide guidance on how to tackle cyber threats and vulnerabilities when procuring 5G equipment, for example by diversifying equipment from different vendors or introducing multi-phase procurement processes;
16. Reaffirms its position on the Digital Europe programme, which imposes security requirements and Commission oversight on entities established in the EU but controlled from third countries, in particular for cybersecurity-related actions;
17. Calls on the Member States to ensure that public institutions and private companies involved in ensuring the proper functioning of critical infrastructure networks such as telecoms, energy, health and social systems, undertake relevant risk assessments that take into account the security threats specifically linked to technical features of the respective system or dependence on external suppliers of hardware and software technologies;
18. Recalls that the current legal framework on telecommunications mandates the Member States to ensure that telecoms operators comply with the integrity and availability of public electronic communication networks, including end-to-end encryption where appropriate; highlights that under the European Electronic Communications Code, Member States have extensive powers to investigate products on the EU market and apply a wide variety of remedies in the event of their non-compliance;
19. Calls on the Commission and the Member States to make security an obligatory aspect in all public procurement procedures for relevant infrastructure at both EU and national level;
20. Reminds Member States of their obligation under the EU legal framework, notably Directive 2013/40/EU on attacks against information systems, to impose sanctions on legal persons that have committed criminal offences such as attacks against such systems; emphasises that Member States should also make use of their ability to impose other sanctions on these legal entities, such as temporary or permanent disqualification

from practicing commercial activities;
21. Calls on the Member States, cybersecurity agencies, telecoms operators, manufacturers and providers of critical infrastructure services to report to the Commission and ENISA any evidence of backdoors or other major vulnerabilities that could compromise the integrity and security of telecoms networks or infringe Union law and fundamental rights; expects national data protection authorities as well as the European Data Protection Supervisor to thoroughly investigate indications of data breaches of personal data by external vendors and to impose appropriate penalties and sanctions in line with European data protection law;
22. Welcomes the upcoming entry into force of a regulation establishing a framework for the screening of foreign direct investments (FDI) for reasons of security and public order, and underlines that this regulation establishes for the first time a list of areas and factors, including communications and cybersecurity, which are relevant for security and public order at EU level;
23. Calls on the Council to speed up its work on the proposed ePrivacy Regulation;
24. Reiterates that the EU needs to support cybersecurity across the entire value chain, from research to the deployment and uptake of key technologies, disseminate relevant information, and promote cyber hygiene and educational curricula including cybersecurity, and believes that, among other measures, the Digital Europe programme will be an efficient tool for that;
25. Urges the Commission and the Member States to take the necessary steps, including robust investment schemes, to create an innovation-friendly environment within the EU, which should be accessible to all businesses in the EU digital economy, including small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs); urges, furthermore that such an environment should allow European vendors to develop new products, services and technologies which would enable them to be competitive;
26. Urges the Commission and the Member States to take into account the above requests in the framework of the upcoming discussions on the future EU-China strategy, as preconditions for the EU to remain competitive and for ensuring the security of its digital infrastructure;
27. Instructs its President to forward this resolution to the Council and the Commission.

Pubblicato in 5G, China, cyber, natsec | Lascia un commento

Sovereignty in a globalised world

Speech by Mario Draghi, President of the ECB, on the award of Laurea honoris causa in law from Università degli Studi di Bologna, Bologna, 22 February 2019

Sovereignty in a globalised world

Pubblicato in EULaw | Lascia un commento

The EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement explained (slides).

The EU-UK Withdrawal Agreement explained (slides).

the_withdrawal_agreement_explained

Pubblicato in EULaw | Contrassegnato | Lascia un commento

The ECJ on the Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Libyia

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT (Third Chamber)
17 January 2019 – Case C?168/17
(Reference for a preliminary ruling — Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures adopted in view of the situation in Libya — A chain of contracts concluded with the aim of issuing a bank guarantee for the benefit of an entity on a list of entities whose funds are to be frozen — Payment of costs arising under counter guarantee agreements — Regulation (EU) No 204/2011 — Article 5 — Definition of ‘funds made available to an entity referred to in Annex III to Regulation No 204/2011’ — Article 12(1)(c) — Definition of ‘a claim under a guarantee’ — Definition of a ‘person or entity acting on behalf of a person referred to in Article 12(1)(a) or (b)’)

Lybia ECJ

Pubblicato in Libya, sanctions | Lascia un commento

The next move has to come from London. There is nothing else we can do from here at this stage. What matters at this stage … is that we know what to expect from the UK, and that we don’t know.

The next move has to come from London. There is nothing else we can do from here at this stage. What matters at this stage … is that we know what to expect from the UK, and that we don’t know.

Margaritis Schinas, the spokesman for the European commission.

Pubblicato in EULaw | Lascia un commento

UK Parliament reject Premier May’s Brexit plan by 432 by 202 – a majority of 230

MPs reject May’s Brexit plan by 432 by 202 – a majority of 230

Pubblicato in EULaw | Lascia un commento

The Sanctions (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019

2019 No. 26 EXITING THE EUROPEAN UNION
The Sanctions (Amendment) (EU Exit) Regulations 2019

These Regulations are made in exercise of the powers conferred by section 8(1) of the European Union (Withdrawal) Act 2018 (c.16) in order to address failures of retained EU law to operate effectively and other deficiencies (in particular under section 8(2)(a) and (g) of that Act) arising from the withdrawal of the UK from the European Union.
These Regulations make amendments to legislation in the field of sanctions and, in particular, amend the existing EU Council Regulations that implement arms embargoes in respect of Afghanistan, the Central African Republic, Somalia and Sudan. They also amend the EU Council Regulations that prohibit claims being made in respect of historic sanctions regimes in relation to the following countries: Haiti, Iraq, Libya and Serbia and Montenegro.
An impact assessment has not been produced for this instrument as no, or no significant, impact on the private or voluntary sector is foreseen.

uksi_20190026_en

Pubblicato in Brexit, sanctions | Lascia un commento

Trade remedies if there’s no Brexit deal

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/trade-remedies-if-theres-no-brexit-deal/trade-remedies-if-theres-no-brexit-deal

Pubblicato in EULaw | Contrassegnato | Lascia un commento

Avvocato generale Bobek: il gestore di un sito Internet che inserisce il plugin di un terzo, come il pulsante « Mi piace » di Facebook, il quale determina la raccolta e la trasmissione dei dati personali degli utenti, è corresponsabile di tale fase del trattamento dei dati

Conclusioni dell’avvocato generale nella causa C-40/17
Fashion ID GmbH & Co. KG / Verbraucherzentrale NRW eV

cp180206it

Pubblicato in EULaw | Lascia un commento

L’avvocato generale Kokott propone alla Corte di dichiarare che, avendo sospeso il governatore della banca di Lettonia dal suo incarico, la Repubblica di Lettonia è venuta meno ai suoi obblighi

cp180207it

Pubblicato in EULaw | Lascia un commento