Skip to content
UK National Cybersecurity Centre: Guidelines for secure AI system development
The future of the internet in China
Material or financial support to Russian decision-makers responsible for the annexation of Crimea and the destabilization of Ukraine (German Khan)
FIIA event: The New Washington Consensus: Implications of U.S. Economic De-Risking from China – (Finnish Institute of International Affairs) FIIA event
The State can legitimately restrict freedom of association on grounds of national security, even if it is not directly threatened by terrorist acts, says the ECHR
The strategy for Artificial Intelligence of the Court of Justice of the European Union
a Nat Sec Law blog by
by Antonino Alì @ University of Trento – Italy
The New Washington Consensus: Remarks by National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan on Renewing American Economic Leadership at the Brookings Institution
ASPI’s Critical Technology Tracker
G7 Leaders’ Statement
G7 Leaders’ Statement on Ukraine – Hiroshima – Japan
Economic coercion: G7 Leaders’ Statement on Economic Resilience and Economic Security
EUROPEAN ECONOMIC SECURITY STRATEGY
The strategy for Artificial Intelligence of the Court of Justice of the European Union
Iran: Council maintains restrictive measures under the non-proliferation sanctions regime after the JCPoA Transition Day
The New Washington Consensus: Remarks by National Security Advisor Jake Sullivan on Renewing American Economic Leadership at the Brookings Institution
Search for:
cp180113en
25 July 2018
Antonino Alì
Follow
Post navigation
←
A judicial authority called upon to execute a European arrest warrant must refrain from giving effect to it if it considers that there is a real risk that the individual concerned would suffer a breach of his fundamental right to an independent tribunal and, therefore, of the essence of his fundamental right to a fair trial on account of deficiencies liable to affect the independence of the judiciary in the issuing Member State – L’autorità giudiziaria chiamata a eseguire un mandato d’arresto europeo deve astenersi dal darvi seguito se ritiene che la persona interessata rischi di subire una violazione del suo diritto fondamentale a un giudice indipendente e, quindi, del contenuto essenziale del suo diritto fondamentale a un equo processo, a causa di carenze idonee a incidere sull’indipendenza del potere giudiziario nello Stato membro emittente
Leave a Reply
You must be
logged in
to post a comment.
Follow